Gries Deco Company
46 Employer Review(s)
Colleagues:
Supervisor:
Tasks:
Salary:
Career:
OVERALL:
Location
#
Country
Date
Rating
Review
Amberg 1
07.09.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Berlin 2
14.03.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Satisfactory staff work. Filling employment. Demotivating income. Average recognition. Satisfactory employment site.
Flensburg 3
29.10.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Lower wage level. Best career opportunities. Not recommendable employer.
Germany 4
19.02.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 5
01.05.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 6
28.01.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 7
02.04.2023
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 8
15.06.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 9
31.03.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 10
31.03.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 11
10.12.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Germany 12
17.04.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Need to improve personnel management. Filling employment. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Germany 13
29.03.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Reasonable job provider.
Germany 14
18.02.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Impeccable Leadership. Excellent activity. First class salary. Best career opportunities. Excellent employer.
Marktredwitz 15
18.12.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Niedernberg 16
17.04.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Niedernberg 17
18.06.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Need to improve personnel management. Interesting tasks. Below-average salary. Best career opportunities. Recommendable workplace.
Niedernberg 18
23.02.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Below-average salary. Average recognition. Reasonable job provider.
Niedernberg 19
20.01.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Mere Work carried out. Below-average salary. Good future prospects. Employers with criticisms.
Niedernberg 20
07.01.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Satisfactory employment site.
Niedernberg 21
07.01.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Satisfactory employment site.
Niedernberg 22
10.01.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Niedernberg 23
09.05.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Lower wage level. Average recognition. Employers with criticisms.
Niedernberg 24
03.08.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Good Management. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Niedernberg 25
23.07.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Reasonable job provider.
Niedernberg 26
02.08.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. Mere Work carried out. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Excellent employer.
Niedernberg 27
11.10.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Niedernberg 28
08.08.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Average recognition. Employers with criticisms.
Niedernberg 29
22.04.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Niedernberg 30
04.07.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Niedernberg 31
10.05.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Niedernberg 32
13.05.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Good Management. No filling operation. Good future prospects. Employers with criticisms.
Niedernberg 33
03.08.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Rickety ladder of success. Satisfactory employment site.
Niedernberg 34
10.10.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Niedernberg 35
26.10.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Interesting tasks. High payments. Recommendable workplace.
Niedernberg 36
24.01.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Niedernberg 37
21.02.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Niedernberg 38
07.01.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Niedernberg 39
06.02.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Satisfactory staff work. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Good future prospects. Satisfactory employment site.
Österreich 40
16.03.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Wachtberg 41
10.03.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Waldshut-Tiengen 42
14.03.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Problematic management style. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Reasonable job provider.
Waldshut-Tiengen 43
14.03.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Reasonable job provider.
Wien 44
22.02.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Wien 45
18.02.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Good Management. Interesting tasks. High payments. Best career opportunities. Recommendable workplace.
Wismar 46
13.10.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
